Rank the Rage of Angels albums

Did I do it right?

Almost. It just lacks a certain “Pethead-ness.” But it just takes practice. 

1. Rage of Angels

So good. Glad I finally got a copy!

2. Rage of Angels 

Almost as good. 

3. Rage of Angels

Terrible. I never spin this one.

eatbugs: only pethead can post 'Rank the' thread's on this forum and get it right, accept it, you'll be happier.  You don't have 'pethead-ness' (arrogance) so give it up.

A pethead 'Rank the' thread is created using the following:

1. Think of a band
2. Type 'Rank the' before the band name
3. Type 'albums' after the band name

Unfortunately even if you follow the above but the thread is not posted by pethead it is not authentic and as such is, quite frankly, worthless.

I didn’t mean to cause offense to anyone. Most of my comments have been tongue-in-cheek. I just have enjoyed creating ranking threads because it’s one way that I like to discuss music. If I came across as arrogant, I apologize. My comments about being the one who can rank and the “pope of rankings” were in jest. 
I made that poll to see if people wanted me to stop, because I don’t want to annoy everyone.

If you, pethead, are a pastor that can affect, influence or speak into, peoples lives, I would be very, very concerned about this.  You may have self-appointed yourself as an internet pastor, like you have self-appointed yourself as a CMR pope, unfortunately we can never know on the internet whether people are who they say they are.  

If you have self-appointed yourself as a pastor, please, please, please think deeply whether you are adding value to peoples lives or, maybe, just maybe, your arrogance shown on the CMR forum is being expressed into the lives that come to you for help and therefore you are not helping but harming.

I don’t need to defend myself, nor do I need to listen to random attacks on my character. I serve Christ and his church. And yes, I am an ordained pastor who serves a local church for the glory of God. I messaged you privately to see if I had offended you in any way, but since you attacked me publicly, I figured I should apologize publicly in case I did something wrong. But I am not accountable to you nor you to me. But I suggest you examine yourself, something we should all do.

Pethead wrote:I don’t need to defend myself, nor do I need to listen to random attacks on my character. I serve Christ and his church. And yes, I am an ordained pastor who serves a local church for the glory of God. I messaged you privately to see if I had offended you in any way, but since you attacked me publicly, I figured I should apologize publicly in case I did something wrong. But I am not accountable to you nor you to me. But I suggest you examine yourself, something we should all do.

Thank you for your public apology, may you learn from this and move on from this time, avoiding the need for future apologies.  Your appointment to ordaned pastor (we are still accepting this on your word) may have been a mistake as you come across as someone who is big-headed and arrogant, maybe you think your ordainment (either real of self-appointed), gives you the entitlement to be this way, to be above others.  I do not believe this is the character of a pastor of God.

wintersdawn wrote:

Pethead wrote:I don’t need to defend myself, nor do I need to listen to random attacks on my character. I serve Christ and his church. And yes, I am an ordained pastor who serves a local church for the glory of God. I messaged you privately to see if I had offended you in any way, but since you attacked me publicly, I figured I should apologize publicly in case I did something wrong. But I am not accountable to you nor you to me. But I suggest you examine yourself, something we should all do.

Thank you for your public apology, may you learn from this and move on from this time, avoiding the need for future apologies.  Your appointment to ordaned pastor (we are still accepting this on your word) may have been a mistake as you come across as someone who is big-headed and arrogant, maybe you think your ordainment (either real of self-appointed), gives you the entitlement to be this way, to be above others.  I do not believe this is the character of a pastor of God.

How dare you? You don’t know me. I’ve already said most of my comments are in jest. You need to repent. My Master and the churches I have served have confirmed my calling. I’m done.

Thank you pethead, I accept your Judgement, you are quite correct and I apologise for my slight's against your character.

I accept your apology. Thank you.

wintersdawn wrote:eatbugs: only pethead can post 'Rank the' thread's on this forum and get it right, accept it, you'll be happier.  You don't have 'pethead-ness' (arrogance) so give it up.

A pethead 'Rank the' thread is created using the following:

1. Think of a band
2. Type 'Rank the' before the band name
3. Type 'albums' after the band name

Unfortunately even if you follow the above but the thread is not posted by pethead it is not authentic and as such is, quite frankly, worthless.

Pethead is simply joking around and we're all playing along. Lighten up.

Temple of Blood wrote:

wintersdawn wrote:eatbugs: only pethead can post 'Rank the' thread's on this forum and get it right, accept it, you'll be happier.  You don't have 'pethead-ness' (arrogance) so give it up.

A pethead 'Rank the' thread is created using the following:

1. Think of a band
2. Type 'Rank the' before the band name
3. Type 'albums' after the band name

Unfortunately even if you follow the above but the thread is not posted by pethead it is not authentic and as such is, quite frankly, worthless.

Pethead is simply joking around and we're all playing along.  Lighten up.

An apology was given and accepted, your determination to continue this is undesirable and my advice to you is to 'let it go'.

You all forgot the demos!

https://www.metal-archives.com/albums/Rage_of_Angels/Demo/822477

https://www.metal-archives.com/albums/Rage_of_Angels/R.E.X._Demo/311485

Thread envy... (You mad at my cool threads bro lol)

Wintersdawn is an obvious troll, don‘t bother to argue with him pethead. Use your time and energy to create new threads.

Wow.  Sorry I asked.

My jokes go over here as well as anywhere else.



Seriously,
I'm not normally a big fan of bonus tracks on reissues, but this needs to get reissued with those demos as a second disc!

eatbugs wrote:Wow.  Sorry I asked.

My jokes go over here as well as anywhere else.



Seriously,
I'm not normally a big fan of bonus tracks on reissues, but this needs to get reissued with those demos as a second disc!

No, me neither, especially the vengeance rising interviews at the end of the reissue albums---Why the !@$#% they do that!  They think I wanna sit there and listen to that &^%$ after I listen to the album-- Dumb@%#$ < that's not bad language, its typos!

My observations, across multiple threads, regarding petheads character were posted with accuracy and truth, even though they were apparently incorrect, therefore an apology was given.  No troll, just calling out someone's arrogant and big-headed posts, even though I was wrong.

wintersdawn wrote:My observations, across multiple threads, regarding petheads character were posted with accuracy and truth, even though they were apparently incorrect, therefore an apology was given.  No troll, just calling out someone's arrogant and big-headed posts, even though I was wrong.

Well if you are not a troll it’s my turn to apologize. Shalom!

wintersdawn wrote:My observations, across multiple threads, regarding petheads character were posted with accuracy and truth, even though they were apparently incorrect, therefore an apology was given.  No troll, just calling out someone's arrogant and big-headed posts, even though I was wrong.

And yet you continue to take backhanded shots at him, masking them with a fake apology.

My observations, across multiple threads, regarding petheads character were posted with accuracy and truth, even though they were apparently incorrect

No troll, just calling out someone's arrogant and big-headed posts, even though I was wrong.


The only one in this thread whose character should come under question is yours.

wintersdawn wrote:My observations, across multiple threads, regarding petheads character were posted with accuracy and truth, even though they were apparently incorrect, therefore an apology was given.  No troll, just calling out someone's arrogant and big-headed posts, even though I was wrong.

I'd hate to live inside your head, You must take yourself so seriously... shame man, just enjoy life, don't be Mr Angry guy.   Lot of people enjoy those threads, and responded to them, and I saw no arrogance, just good wit and charm. 

Now, slap this on your face   and behave.

Cheers for the advice, done.

wintersdawn wrote:Cheers for the advice, done.

Wanna hear a joke...  What do you get when you are given unwanted advice...

ALLLLriiiiiight...  WD backed off from his trolling so let's please not egg him on any more.

That being said, WD, your coming out of hiding just to bully folks like Pethead (or Soundmass, prior) is not appreciated.  Please play nice...