The problem with economic the classism of marxists and crony/monopoly capitalists

The problem with the economic classism hate the rich mindset of neomarxists and the economic classism hate of the poor of the social darwinist monopoly/crony capitalists.

With the former, they fail to understand that the upper middle class and the upper class wealthy often have to sacrifice their personal privacy and sometimes the safety of themselves and often also their families, whichcan be quite taxing to a person's mental and sometimes physical well being. They have to take certain burdens that the lower middle class and poor do not. It's not always sunshine and rainbows for them, and being human beings means that this can cause alot of certain kinds of stress for them and psychological turmoil just as the poor have theirs.
There arw benefits and drawbacks to being upper middle class and upper class wealthy(especially when accompanied by fame, as not all wealthy people are very famous, but some are). So this *eat/hate the rich* attitude often taught to the poorer classes is sometimes quite unjust, ignorant, arrogant, hypocritical, and unjustified(sometimes it is, it depends on the individual richer persons character and just how wealthy they are and how famous, and how corrupt they are, but corruption and depravity and greed are not the exclusive province of the wealthy, famous, or upper classes, there arw plenty if lower middle class and poor people who also have those negative traits, and not all upper middle class and upper class wealthy people are like that).
With the latters *eat/hate the poor* and negative stereotypes of them being lazy, ignorant, uneducated , vermin. Is that while it is true of some of them it is not of all(or even most) of them...and of course the wealthier people sometimes have those same traits,
They don't understand that the lower classes may have sometimes more risky and dangerous hard labor jobs that pay wages that are not fair for the type of work done-(on the flip side some lower class people may think all higher class people have cushy non-laborious and non-dangerous/risky jobs and lifestyles...which can be the case for some of them sometimes..but not all of them all the time)- and that the lower classes also have their unique mix of burdens(and privelages) they the upper classes or wealthy don't.
Neither can truly understand the other(unless for the lower class people they actually started out wealthier in life, perhaps raised in such families and/or perhaps upper middle class and made their way up early in late teens or early adulthood and for one reason or the other hit rock bottom going from riches to rags . And for the upper class people if they started life in a family and environment and/or teens and/or early adulthood poor or lower middle class and then achieved their higher class through one means or another).

In short, each class(lower classes, middle classes, and upper classes, and those in between)need to stop demonizing and dehumanization of each others classes based soley on class, and empathize with each other based on common humanity(as for psychopaths...they exist in all classes as do sympaths and empath, and socio/psychopaths will exploit, abuse, be corrupt and selfish and greedy and terrible to others ...regardless of economic class status.). And each needs to recognize that no economic class status is bad or good in itself, it simply is a result of human nature and society, and actually the more economic classes in a society the better a chance for uowards(or downwards) mobility and therefore more fairness, justice, and opportunity to get higher or lower depending on a number if variables . Is this perfect ? No. There is no such thing as a perfect system, but such a system is the best of a bad situation.
There is nothing bad or good about individuals based soley in economic status, none are virtuous or evil/corrupt/lacking virtue based soley on economic status, and that's the problem....many people assume that to be poorer means more virtue and to be richer means more corruptiveness, and many assume the opposite as well.
These are all intellectually and morally lazy, philosophically shallow understandings of the world, each is incorrect and needs to expand its knowledge, understanding, and comprehension by thinking more deeply , rationally, and empathetically.
These misconcieved hatreds based on such statuses cannot and will not end unless and until everyone in each class comes to these realizations, knowledge, understanding.

Of course it is wrong morally and intellectually that there us extreme poverty and super extreme wealth(and power coupled with it, I'm thinking the super billionaires here and trillionaires like the Rothschilds family...whom own and control most if the worlds wealth and thereby exorcise godlike control over billions of peoples lives, if they were just super rich like thus but not also super powerful and provably super corrupt as well...I'd have little issue with their economic class in and of itself)., and steps should be taken to lessen the gap, but not to do away with it entirely.

Anyways, this is my issue with both the neomarxists philosophies and the philosophies of the social darwinist monopoly/crony capitalists(and of course I'm aware that one can be of Marxist or left philosophies and/or poor and a social darwinism and one can be even monopoly capitalist and not social darwinist, but generally crony capitalists and full on communist types tend to be two sides of the same socially darwinist and totalitarian coin).

Thoughts?